Research

Research Based, Research Driven, and Field Tested

Why you must use all three!

 

The Learning Success System exercises are designed on one or more of the three following criteria:

 

  • Research Based
  • Research Driven
  • Field Tested

 

Using all three areas creates a huge advantage for users of the Learning Success System. Read below to learn why. First let's define what these mean.

 

Research Based - This is when the exact exercises used have been through critical review by researchers. Obviously is something has been proven to work then it's a good idea to use it. And we certainly do

 

Research Driven - This is when a concept has been researched and proven effective. We then develop exercises based upon this concept. We constantly monitor the research for these new findings. Not only in the field of educational research but also in neuroscience and positive psychology. These new findings happen on a very regular basis and by following the research we are able to keep our system at the forefront. This is cutting edge science. Many of the most important findings are very recent and are not even in the textbooks yet.

 

Field Tested - It is very common for those in the field to come up with the best ideas and to make realizations that are critical to the process. Many of these concepts have simply not caught the eye of the researchers or have not had the time to be researched. But they can have big value and be very effective. If something has been observed once or twice this is not a reason to get excited over the idea. In that case we would not use it. But if the idea has been observed independently by hundreds or even thousands of practitioners in the field then leaving it out would be foolish. 

 

You may have seen many systems or people speaking of using systems that are wholly researched based. This sounds laudable but keep in mind that this might be a synonym for "behind the times". It takes decades for research to filter down to academia. Textbooks are notoriously behind. So unless a practitioner keeps up with the new research it is possible that they are actually decades behind the true knowledge base. Keeping on mind that the most important discoveries are barely a decade old this is very important. Many of the most popular systems used today are based on research that is over 80 years old. This doesn't necessarily mean the system is bad, just that it may be incomplete and not ive you the full advantages you will want to help your child.

 

Because the Learning Success System derives its concepts from all three it bundles the advantages of all. Obviously, you want a system that gives you the most advantages and makes helping your child as easy as possible for you. Right?

 

Get the Learning Success System here.

Found 54 results
Author Title Type [ Year(Asc)]
Filters: Keyword is Child  [Clear All Filters]
2016
R. Roche, Viswanathan, P., Clark, J. E., and Whitall, J., Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) can adapt to perceptible and subliminal rhythm changes but are more variable., Hum Mov Sci, vol. 50, pp. 19-29, 2016.
T. Qi, Gu, B., Ding, G., Gong, G., Lu, C., Peng, D., Malins, J. G., and Liu, L., More bilateral, more anterior: Alterations of brain organization in the large-scale structural network in Chinese dyslexia., Neuroimage, vol. 124, no. Pt A, pp. 63-74, 2016.
S. Sparre Geertsen, Thomas, R., Larsen, M. Nejst, Dahn, I. Marie, Andersen, J. Needham, Krause-Jensen, M., Korup, V., Nielsen, C. Malta, Wienecke, J., Ritz, C., Krustrup, P., and Lundbye-Jensen, J., Motor Skills and Exercise Capacity Are Associated with Objective Measures of Cognitive Functions and Academic Performance in Preadolescent Children., PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 8, p. e0161960, 2016.
Z. Xia, Hoeft, F., Zhang, L., and Shu, H., Neuroanatomical anomalies of dyslexia: Disambiguating the effects of disorder, performance, and maturation., Neuropsychologia, vol. 81, pp. 68-78, 2016.
J. L. Preston, Molfese, P. J., Frost, S. J., W Mencl, E., Fulbright, R. K., Hoeft, F., Landi, N., Shankweiler, D., and Pugh, K. R., Print-Speech Convergence Predicts Future Reading Outcomes in Early Readers., Psychol Sci, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 75-84, 2016.
E. M. Harvey, Miller, J. M., J Twelker, D., and Davis, A. L., Reading Fluency in School-Aged Children with Bilateral Astigmatism., Optom Vis Sci, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 118-25, 2016.
2015
T. Iuculano, Rosenberg-Lee, M., Richardson, J., Tenison, C., Fuchs, L., Supekar, K., and Menon, V., Cognitive tutoring induces widespread neuroplasticity and remediates brain function in children with mathematical learning disabilities., Nat Commun, vol. 6, p. 8453, 2015.
S. Narayanasamy, Vincent, S. J., Sampson, G. P., and Wood, J. M., Impact of simulated hyperopia on academic-related performance in children., Optom Vis Sci, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 227-36, 2015.
S. de Bode, Chanturidze, M., Mathern, G. W., and Dubinsky, S., Literacy after cerebral hemispherectomy: Can the isolated right hemisphere read?, Epilepsy Behav, vol. 45, pp. 248-53, 2015.
M. Pia Bucci, Ajrezo, L., and Wiener-Vacher, S., Oculomotor tasks affect differently postural control in healthy children., Int J Dev Neurosci, vol. 46, pp. 1-6, 2015.
B. Hoza, Smith, A. L., Shoulberg, E. K., Linnea, K. S., Dorsch, T. E., Blazo, J. A., Alerding, C. M., and McCabe, G. P., A randomized trial examining the effects of aerobic physical activity on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in young children., J Abnorm Child Psychol, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 655-67, 2015.
A. Martin, Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., and Richlan, F., Reading in the brain of children and adults: a meta-analysis of 40 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies., Hum Brain Mapp, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1963-81, 2015.
C. Nakeva Von Mentzer, Lyxell, B., Sahlén, B., Dahlström, Ö., Lindgren, M., Ors, M., Kallioinen, P., Engström, E., and Uhlén, I., Segmental and suprasegmental properties in nonword repetition--an explorative study of the associations with nonword decoding in children with normal hearing and children with bilateral cochlear implants., Clin Linguist Phon, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 216-35, 2015.
S. V. Bharadwaj, Maricle, D., Green, L., and Allman, T., Working memory, short-term memory and reading proficiency in school-age children with cochlear implants., Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 1647-53, 2015.
2014
E. A. Haapala, Poikkeus, A. - M., Tompuri, T., Kukkonen-Harjula, K., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lindi, V., and Lakka, T. A., Associations of motor and cardiovascular performance with academic skills in children., Med Sci Sports Exerc, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1016-24, 2014.
W. J. Dawson, Benefits of music training are widespread and lifelong: a bibliographic review of their non-musical effects., Med Probl Perform Art, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 57-63, 2014.
S. Dalsgaard, Kvist, A. Primdal, Leckman, J. F., Nielsen, H. Skyt, and Simonsen, M., Cardiovascular safety of stimulants in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a nationwide prospective cohort study., J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 302-10, 2014.
K. K. Jasińska and Petitto, L. A., Development of neural systems for reading in the monolingual and bilingual brain: new insights from functional near infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging., Dev Neuropsychol, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 421-39, 2014.
S. - H. Chang and Yu, N. - Y., The effect of computer-assisted therapeutic practice for children with handwriting deficit: a comparison with the effect of the traditional sensorimotor approach., Res Dev Disabil, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1648-57, 2014.
E. S. Norton, Black, J. M., Stanley, L. M., Tanaka, H., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Sawyer, C., and Hoeft, F., Functional neuroanatomical evidence for the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia., Neuropsychologia, vol. 61, pp. 235-46, 2014.
A. Seither-Preisler, Parncutt, R., and Schneider, P., Size and synchronization of auditory cortex promotes musical, literacy, and attentional skills in children., J Neurosci, vol. 34, no. 33, pp. 10937-49, 2014.

Pages